US Supreme Court Denies Review of Carbofuran 01 June 2011:

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied a petition by FMC Corporation and three national grower groups for review of a lower appellate court ruling which had upheld the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decision to deny an administrative hearing on the revocation of domestic tolerances for carbofuran, according to a press release.

“We are greatly disappointed by the US Supreme Court’s decision not to review the lower court’s ruling on EPA’s actions, which sets a bad precedent for US agriculture,” said Dr. Michael Morelli, Director of Global Regulatory Affairs, FMC Agricultural Products Group in a prepared statement.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit earlier reinstated import tolerances for carbofuran for rice, bananas, coffee and sugar cane, noting in its written opinion that EPA had acknowledged that “exposure to carbofuran in imported foods alone is safe,” according to the release.

The court ruled that EPA’s decision to revoke the import tolerances for these foods was “arbitrary and capricious,” according to the release.

The National Corn Growers Association, National Sunflower Association, National Potato Council and FMC jointly petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court. These grower associations, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and all 50 Secretaries of State Departments of Agriculture went on record supporting the continued, but very limited use of carbofuran that FMC had proposed to EPA.

Did you like this? Share it:

About the author

Passionate about animal welfare and conservation, veggie and dairy-free, I live in the Wiltshire (UK) countryside. I co-founded Birders Against Wildlife Crime and Birds Korea. Trustee of the League against Cruel Sports On Twitter @charliemoores

Comments are closed.


Unless otherwise specified all text and images copyright Talking Naturally