technique
Fieldcraft: finding, hearing and watching the birds that hide
The practical side of watching birds: finding a species that does not want to be found, working with what you can hear rather than see, and getting more out of the time you spend in the field.
The practical side of watching birds: getting a usable view of something that does not want to be seen, and working with what can be heard rather than what can be seen. Identification material assumes a bird in the open at reasonable range. A great deal of birdwatching is the work of getting to that point, and that work has its own techniques.
A large share of it concerns skulking species. A bird that spends its life inside dense cover is not hiding from the observer in particular; it is doing what its ecology requires, and the response is to make the encounter more likely rather than to try to force it. Waiting in one place, working with the light rather than against it, and learning what a species does at particular times of day all raise the odds. Playback does not, at least not without a cost to the bird, and the account here says why.
Sound does more work than most beginners expect. In dense habitat the majority of birds present are heard and never seen, and the ones that are seen are usually located by ear first. Learning the common calls of a place is the single change that most increases what a visit produces.
Optics belong here too, in the sense of what a particular instrument is actually like to use in the field over a long day, which is different from what its specification says. Those assessments sit in the reviews section.
- Skulking birds: the meaning of the term in birdwatching
Skulking birds are not secretive ones, and neither are inconspicuous. What the four words actually describe, and why the difference changes what you do.
- Birders Against Wildlife Crime: reporting what you see
Raptor persecution on British moorland is documented and under-reported. A campaign built on the idea that those best placed to record it are already out.
- Optics companies sell to birders and to hunters
The same manufacturers supply both markets and sponsor both worlds. Whether that should trouble a birdwatcher choosing binoculars is worth arguing out.
Notesshort entries, not full articles
- The Biggest Twitch: a world record year, by the people who did it
Ruth Miller and Alan Davies spent 2008 chasing a world year list across 27 countries, beat a record that had stood since 1989, and finished on 4,341 species.
- Conference Calls, December 2011
An edition of the Conference Calls series, recorded on 2 December 2011.
- Conference Calls, September 2011: listing, and the panel format
An edition of the Conference Calls series from 10 September 2011, which took in bird listing and the services birders keep their lists on.
- The Grumpy Birder: Bo Beolens on what irritates birders
Bo Beolens, the Fatbirder, on the things about birdwatching that are worth complaining about, in a long-running column.
- Jeff Gordon on the American Birding Association
A membership organisation founded in 1969 and widely written off by 2010, and its new president on what it was for and whether it still had a role.
- Rob Lambert on the Isles of Scilly
Whether Scilly's decline as a birding destination has been exaggerated, and what changed: with a historian of British birdwatching.
Common questions
What does skulking mean?
Keeping to dense cover and avoiding the open, in a way that makes a bird hard to see even when it is close and calling. It describes a habit rather than a taxonomic group: warblers, crakes, rails and many tropical understorey birds all do it, and the term is used of individual behaviour as well as of species.
Is playback a reasonable way to see a skulking bird?
It works, which is the problem. A territorial bird responding to a recording is spending energy and exposing itself to answer a rival that does not exist, and in a heavily visited place it may do so many times a day. Where it is used at all it should be brief, occasional, and never on a scarce or breeding bird.
How much difference does learning calls actually make?
In closed habitat it changes the count substantially, because most of the birds present are audible and invisible. It also changes the identification: a call is frequently more diagnostic than a brief view, particularly among the species that skulk.
What is the most useful thing to change first?
Staying still for longer in one place. Covering ground finds the birds that are in the open; sitting down near good cover and waiting finds the ones that are not, and the second group is where most of the difficulty lives.